Comparative effects of volume history on bronchoconstriction induced by hyperventilation and methacholine in asthmatic subjects.

The aim of this study was to find out if bronchodilatation following deep inspiration can be induced by the inhalation of a "natural" stimulus (hyperventilation of cold dry air), and if the effect is similar to that induced by methacholine. After baseline assessment of lung resistance (RL), 10 asthmatic subjects were asked to inhale cold dry air for 3 min. RL was monitored continuously for 3-4 min, at which time subjects were asked to take a fast deep inspiration. After recovery, the manoeuvre was repeated and RL was reassessed. The manoeuvre was then repeated a third time. After functional recovery, progressive doses of methacholine were inhaled until the increase in RL was comparable to that obtained after hyperventilation (56 +/- 16% and 65 +/- 24%, respectively, mean +/- SD, NS). The same deep inspiration manoeuvre was repeated three times with recovery as after hyperventilation of cold dry air. Maximum changes in RL were not significantly different after each of the three manoeuvres for either type of bronchoconstriction. The mean fall in RL was 14.2 +/- 9.9% after hyperventilation and 16.4 +/- 10.5% after methacholine. There was a satisfactory correlation (r = 0.80, p less than 0.01) between the bronchodilatation after deep inspiration for both types of stimuli. We conclude that the bronchodilator effect of deep inspiration is no different using either a pharmacological stimulus (methacholine) or a "natural" stimulus (hyperventilation of unconditioned air). These results show that assessing the response to hyperventilation with manoeuvres requiring deep inspiration, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) may alter airway tone in a way similar to pharmacological stimuli.